Sen. David Vitter 2004 Campaign Ads

	Duration: 114 seconds Upload Time: 07-07-10 16:55:21 User: Veracifier :::: Favorites
Description: Admitted Prostitute Patron Sen. David Vitter (R-LA), 2004 Senate campaign ads. Share with friends
Comments
fruticetum ::: Favorites I am not the one condemning this man. You are, based on something you don't know. See the difference? 07-07-29 10:10:27 _____________________________________________________
fruticetum ::: Favorites I can't explain it, and neither can you, so it's best to withhold judgment. 07-07-29 10:11:09 _____________________________________________________
nystreetfighter ::: Favorites Your absolute stupidity on this issue has reached unparalleled heights. Burkett admitted that he lied in a CBS interview with Rather. The main point if you were sharp enough to even buy a clue is that CBS did accept responsibility. CBS apologized for airing the story, Mapes, Howard and Rather are no longer there. How is that not accepting responsibility? 07-07-29 11:29:54 _____________________________________________________
nystreetfighter ::: Favorites How much of a delusional dipshit can you be? Only a fucking incompetent inbred like you compares an automobile ACCIDENT to prostitute solicitation which is INTENTIONAL. If you had any credibility I'd say you're damaging it but your idiocy is pretty comical so I encourage you to go on. 07-07-29 11:36:50 _____________________________________________________
nystreetfighter ::: Favorites And the action of soliting hookers doesn't reflect Vitter's intent? He patronized prostitutes in 2 different cities because he wanted to talk? It's a logically flawed argument to compare accidents and intentional actions in defense of Vitter. You need an intervention for morons to stop you from embarassing yourself further. Are you even serious? 07-07-29 11:56:12 _____________________________________________________
nystreetfighter ::: Favorites So, frutidiot what were Vitter's intentions in soliciting prostitutes. Was it an accident? I'm curious to hear the astute insight of a fucking nitwit like you on this issue. 07-07-29 12:10:50 _____________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________
nystreetfighter ::: Favorites Of course you can't explain it because you'd have to admit Vitter's hypocrisy. It's interesting, given your posts on the infidelities of Democrats that you now find it best to withhold judgment on Vitter. One might even call your stance, *wait for it* HYPOCRITICAL Please continue replying. 07-07-29 12:13:11 _____________________________________________________
fruticetum ::: Favorites Democrats have cheated. There is no debate about that, fucktard. But since we have established that intent is key to hypocrisy, and since you have no idea of Vitter's intent, you have no alternative but to shut the fuck up. Comprende? 07-07-29 13:09:18 _____________________________________________________
fruticetum ::: Favorites I don't know his intent just as you don't, you fucking jackass. But I am not the one condemning him. 07-07-29 13:10:04 _____________________________________________________
fruticetum ::: Favorites Shall we make it 20 times I have had to explain this very simple concept? The accident scenario was an example of how intent doesn't always equal action. I never said Vitter's action was accidental. I said there could be other reasons for his actions that may belie his intent. Do you comprehend yet you autistic piece of fucking leftwing shit. 07-07-29 13:13:56 _____________________________________________________